When Should You Use Abbreviations and Acronyms?
I have one piece of simple advice about using abbreviations and acronyms. Whether in claims, responses, contractual letters, reports or any important communications on your project:
Do not use them….
at all…
ever!
Let’s look at a real-life example of why this is so important.
Our consultancy business, Hewitt Decipher Partnership, was recently appointed by a contractor. Our job was to prepare claims on behalf of the contractor for an extension of time and additional payment on a large project.
Part of our process is to examine the project records for evidence of what happened. We select certain documents to include in the claims as substantiation of the facts.
The Problem
We soon realised we had a problem. It was extremely hard to understand the letters, meeting minutes, progress reports, etc. The reason? They contained so many abbreviations and acronyms, it was like reading documents written in code.
Even responses to our requests for information from the contractor were confusing because of this same problem. Maybe the contractor was encouraged in this. Because, at the beginning of the Employer’s Requirements, there was a list of no less than 271 abbreviations used in the document.
I was very disappointed to note and surprised that even an organisation such as FIDIC, who purport to draft contract conditions that are easily and clearly understood by engineers, has slipped into this unprofessional practice. The 2017 editions of the various FIDIC contracts use several abbreviations including “DAAB”, “EOT”, “FPC”, “IPC”, “NOD” and “QM”. Do you know what all of these terms mean?
No?
Well, neither did I until I looked them up in the Definitions section.
Comprehension is Key
It’s so important to remember that, when drafting formal documents, firstly they should be fully understood by your opposite number on the project when he or she receives the communication in a couple of days’ time. But also, by someone such as a person in the addressee’s head office, an adjudicator, an arbitrator or a judge. These people have no prior knowledge of the project and in some cases may have no experience in the subject matter. Peppering a document with abbreviations and acronyms that only the personnel who are intimate with the project can understand is not going to achieve the necessary clarity.
Some people, including the drafters of the FIDIC 2017 editions, mistakenly think that including a list of abbreviations and acronyms at the front-end of the document is acceptable.
I disagree. Why?
Because people tend not to read all documents from front to back like a novel, but often only need to refer and understand isolated sections. Therefore, if they come across something referred to as “PL3” in the document they will have to break off from what they are reading to search for a meaning. This does not make the reader’s job easy. It may lead to confusion or misunderstanding, which is exactly the opposite of what we should be trying to achieve.
Why Is This Happening?
So, why do the drafters of documents think that the use of abbreviations and acronyms is a good thing? I can only think that typing “PL3” instead of “Podium Level 3” saves around two seconds of typing time. The authors give their two seconds a higher level of importance than a reader being able to understand what they have typed. Well, here is a top tip for lazy typists:
If you have to refer to “Podium Level 3” many times in your document, type “PL3” in your draft. Then, use the MS Word, sorry, Microsoft Word “find and replace” function to change “PL3” to Podium Level 3” throughout the document.
For the sake of clear understanding, I will repeat the advice that I gave a the beginning of this blog:
Do not use abbreviations or acronyms – at all! – ever!
If you’d like to learn more about how to write effective documents and achieve success with your claims, check out our Construction Claims E-courses.
13 Comments
Add comment Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
I could be wrong, but I suspect Gordon’s question was slightly mischievous!
As the post said do not use acronyms .
However when writing letters and claims I have found it helpful that instead of writing the full name of the company/organization etc. every time I write the full name in full followed by the acronym in brackets and then use the acronym onwards. I have been doing this for many years. I think this method is beneficial for arbitrators, adjudicators, judges etc. Also for my 2 index fingers (not a very good typist!!!)
FIDIC is an abbreviation. Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs-Conseils is ungainly in any text. Comprehension is the key. Most people involved with construction contracts are probably more familiar with FIDIC than its unabbreviated form. Use abbreviations sparingly and, unless so familiar that it is used more often than the full form, write the words in full when introducing an abbreviation into into the text.
An interesting comparison the time saved by an acronym versus the time wasted trying to establish the meaning. Not only have we departed from the grammatical rule of writing an acronym long hand in the first instance but acronyms are now created with alarming frequency and it is now quite common to find when you ask the drafter of a document what a particular acronym means to be told that they don’t know.
I agree there is too much room for misunderstanding at the best of times so any item which introduces ambiguity should be avoided at all cost. It will be a good day when all contract document are written in plain English.
I think to make it easy whenever we draft a letter or report, if a term during the drafting come first time then better to write full spelling and in bracket write the abbreviation like Podium Level 3(PL3). So the reader will not go to list of abbreviation et. and it will save the time.
Sorry, but what is FIDIC???
Hi Gordon – FIDIC is an international body that produces standard forms of construction contract. It’s full name is Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs-Conseils or in English, International Federations of Consulting Engineers.
I think the key is don’t overdo it. As always the case, take everything in moderation.
I do agree with this advice. It’s difficult to understand abbreviations sometime in the construction documents.
I do not think that no use of abbreviations and acronyms always makes it easier to read and understand a document. A document with a list of abbreviations and acronyms is preferable for me.
Hi Akira – thanks for sharing your opinion.
Totally agree. I dislike this practice for the very reasons you cite.