Payment for Work Not in Accordance with the Contract

A former Claims Class student asked my advice on a matter which I thought would be an interesting case study to share. The Contract conditions are FIDIC and the question around non-payment of work which was not in accordance with the contract.

Background

Each month the Engineer makes deductions in the payment certificate for Non-Conformance Reports under Sub-Clause 14.6 (Issue of Interim Payment Certificates), sub-paragraphs (a) & (b).

The Contractor does not contest the Non-Conformance Reports. They state that the defects will be rectified. A problem being that this is likely to take some time to achieve.

The Contractor is contesting the Engineers right to deduct for defects in interim certificates. These deductions are for works not in accordance with the Contract. The Employer has performance security and 5% retention, so the Contractor claims they would be put at a further disadvantage of the deductions for NCRs.

My Advice

Sub-Clause 7.5 (Rejection) provides that the Engineer may reject work not in accordance with the Contract by giving notice. Hopefully, the Engineer has issued the NCRs as notices under the provisions of this clause. If not, you may want to take a look at this blog which answers the question, "what to do if you have not submitted a notice?". For the purpose of this article, we will assume they were.

Sub-Clause 14.6 (Issue of Interim Payment Certificates), sub-paragraph (a) states that if anything supplied or work done by the Contractor is not in accordance with the Contract, the cost of rectification or replacement may be withheld until rectification or replacement has been completed.

This allows the Engineer to withhold payment for anything not in accordance with the Contract, plus the cost of rectification. Subject to the issue of non-conformance reports, the work is not in accordance with the Contract.

The Contractor's argument that he is at a disadvantage is not sustainable. They are the party at fault by giving rise to the items of non-conformance.

The retention and performance bonds are there to provide money for the Employer to complete the works if the Contract is terminated. Not to provide security against defective works.

If this topic was of interest, you may find our Understanding Claims Under FIDIC E-course useful. Click here to find out more.


Notices: Should a Contractor submit if he is not sure whether he intends to make a claim?

A Claims Class blog follower recently asked for advice on the correct interpretation of FIDIC Sub-Clause 20.1 (Contractor’s Claims).  What happens in situations where the Contractor is not sure if he will submit a claim or not.

Often the Contractor becomes aware of an event that may cause delay, additional Cost or entitlement for additional payment. At that time, he may not be aware of the final effect of the event.
Read more


The Second Edition of the FIDIC Rainbow Suite has Arrived

At a packed International Contract Users’ Conference held in London on 5-6 December 2017, FIDIC finally unveiled the Second Edition of the 1999 Rainbow Suite, Red, Yellow and Silver Books.  Whilst the Second Edition largely follows the 2016 pre-release version of the Yellow Book, FIDIC have taken on board some of the comments made by the friendly reviewers, and made a number of important changes.Read more


20 Changes in the FIDIC 2017 Editions From a Claims Perspective

I have just returned from the FIDIC International User’s Conference in London, attended by roughly 400 delegates and speakers, all there to hear about the new editions of the Red, Yellow and Silver FIDIC Forms of Contract. In this blog, I have highlighted 20 changes that are of particular relevance to claims practitioners:Read more


Notices, Conditions Precedent and Time Bars

One of the most frequently asked questions at CPD events and our Claims Class Intensive Training Courses is in connection with notices. The questions are usually along the lines of , ‘If we fail to send a notice of claim, or we do not send the notice in time, will our claim be time-barred?’Read more