Construction contract FIDIC 2017

How Does FIDIC 2017 Affect Claims?

I guess like many of you, I have not had the opportunity to examine the 2017 editions of the FIDIC contracts in much detail, because as yet, I have not come across any projects that are using them. This situation will, however, gradually change. As it does, we will need to know what has changed and how it has changed. As such projects reach final account stage there will undoubtedly be claims to resolve and disputes to settle. I have recently been doing research for a forthcoming book, so thought it would be worthwhile to highlight the changes from a claims perspective.

Employer's Claims

Sub-Clause 2.5 (Employer’s Claims) has been deleted in the FIDIC 2017 editions. Employer’s claims are now dealt with together with Contractor’s claims under Sub-Clauses 20.1 (Claims) and 20.2 (Claims For Payment and/or EOT).

The Employer is now obliged to give a notice of claim no later than 28 days after the event or circumstances giving rise to the claim. This has now become a condition precedent to entitlement for both Parties.

If the Engineer considers that a notice of claim was not given within the stipulated 28-days, he/she is obliged to give a notice of such within 14 days of receipt of the notice of claim. If the Engineer fails to do so, the notice will be deemed to have been given within the stipulated time. The responding Party may also give a notice to the Engineer if they consider that the notice of claim was out of time.

Claims for Payment

Sub-Clause 20.2 (Claims For Payment and/or EOT) is a little more descriptive of what is meant by “a fully detailed claim”. It requires the claimant to include ‘a detailed description of the event or circumstances giving rise to the Claim’. Also, ‘A statement of the contractual and/or legal basis of the Claim’ must be provided. These requirements are just a matter of good practice. Nevertheless, previously, many claimants did not include such basic information within their claims.

The period for submission of the fully detailed claim has been extended from 42 days to 84 days. But, failure to submit ‘A statement of the contractual and/or legal basis of the Claim’ within this time period will result in the notice of claim becoming lapsed. FIDIC is not clear on what this actually means. However, I believe that the intention is that the claim becomes time-barred.

The Engineer is obliged to consult with the Parties in an endeavour to reach agreement. If agreement is not reached, the Engineer must make a fair determination within 42 days of receiving the claim or additional particulars of the claim. If there is no agreement to extend this period, failure to issue a notice of either agreement of determination shall be deemed to be a rejection of the claim. The claimant may then refer the matter as a dispute. Previously, the Engineer only had to respond to the claim within 42 days. No time limit existed on the period for agreement or determination. Now they have to bring the matter to a resolution within 42 days. Six-weeks is not an onerous time to achieve this, provided that the Engineer takes action immediately upon receiving the claim.

E-Courses

Disputes & Arbitration

Clause 21 (Disputes and Arbitration) is solely concerned with disputes. It distinguishes between claims and disputes, reflecting the fact that claims only become disputes if they cannot be agreed. They should not be regarded as being related.

The clauses dealing with claims and determinations have become much wordier and much more complicated. To my mind, they are not easy to follow or to understand. This seems to be a departure of FIDIC’s intention to write contracts for engineers rather than for lawyers. Personally, I see this lack of clarity as a route to contention.

Having said this, it is apparent that FIDIC have attempted to strengthen the procedures relating to claims and responses. If we consider the amount of time-consuming and costly disputes which arise because the Parties have not complied with either their obligations or with good practice when dealing with claims, this is definitely a step in the right direction.

Will it mean more work for contractors or engineers?

I don’t think that the changes require any more work than should have been put in under the 1999 editions. However, the consequences of non-compliance are now more severe. Both contractors and engineers need to get their acts together. They must stop thinking that they can ignore their obligations to manage claims in accordance with the Contract without consequences.

-----

Find out more about our FIDIC e-courses over on our e-courses page.


Need Staff Training During Lockdown? No Problem!

Whilst COVID-19 has caused immeasurable harm, it has at least taught us one good thing: people can work from home without a loss of efficiency.

But what about staff training?

Video conferencing (think Zoom, MS Teams, etc.) is being used to great effect. Remote working and meetings have saved time and cut down on travel costs. The sharing of information via webinars has also seen a huge upsurge in recent months.

Read more


Avoid Construction Disputes

How Education and Training Avoids Disputes

I don't usually have much to say about education and training or attempt to promote our Claims Class courses through our blogs. But, this month I am going to make an exception and for good reason. Recent reports demonstrate that education and training will avoid time-consuming and costly construction disputes.

HKA’s report, Claims and Dispute Causation – a Global Market Sector Analysis and ARCADIS’s Global Construction Disputes Report 2019 are both pretty scathing. Both point to a lack level of knowledge exhibit when it comes down to contractual matters and claims.

Read more


COVID-19

COVID-19: Options for Contractors, Engineers and Employers

In my last blog, I discussed the effects of COVID-19 under the FIDIC Red and Yellow Books. Particularly whether contractors are entitled to claim for an extension of time and/or costs.

My advice was just a few weeks ago. At that time, some contractors were anticipating delays. Firstly caused by supply chain problems associated with plant, goods or materials sourced from China. Secondly by the travel restrictions which were in place. My thoughts were that,  the Contractor will be entitled to an extension of time provided he can demonstrate delay to the Time for Completion and/or the incurrence of Cost. He may also be entitled to claim for additional payment for Cost incurred.

Read more


Force Majeure

The Perfect Claim

Exciting news: We spent a large chunk of 2019 developing a new course, The Perfect Claim. Now, we’re ready to share it with you in 2020. But first, let’s take a step back. Why the need for another course?

Well…

Read more


Case Study: In-House Training for Government Employees in Africa

As well as delivering online e-courses, we offer in-house training for companies. We were approached by the government department responsible for roads and highways in an African country. The department was experiencing several problems related to claims and wanted to train their in-house staff on how claims should be managed effectively. The problems were:Read more


Q&A: Delay Analysis

In partnership with the CIOB, Claims Class is running a series of monthly webinars on construction claims. The webinars cover some of the modules Construction Claims e-courses. In this webinar, we took a look at preparing a delay analysis.

At the end of each webinar, we invite questions and send the attendees answers to any questions that we do not have time to answer during the webinar. We've received good feedback from the two previous blogs on Q&A: Contract Administration and Q&A: Types of Claim.  So, I've decided to do the same for this month's blog. The following are questions and answers from the webinar on Delay Analysis.Read more


construction claims responses and determinations

Q&A: Types of Construction Claims

In partnership with the CIOB, Claims Class is running a series of monthly webinars on construction claims. The webinars are a condensed version of our Construction Claims e-courses.

At the end of each webinar, we invite questions and send the attendees answers to any questions that we do not have time to answer during the webinar. I thought that this would provide some useful insight to our blog readers. The following are questions and answers from the webinar on Types of Claim.Read more


Q&A: Contract Administration for Claims

In partnership with the CIOB, Claims Class is running a series of monthly webinars on construction claims. The webinars are based on our Construction Claims e-courses and workshops and have attracted between 150 and 300 attendees per session.

At the end of each webinar, we invite questions and send the attendees answers to any questions that we do not have time to answer during the webinar. I thought that this would provide some useful insight to our blog readers so, the following are questions and answers from the webinar on Contract Administration for Claims.Read more


5 Tips for Success When Claiming for Variations

A question that I am often asked during CPD talks and claims training courses is “is it necessary to submit claims for a variation?”. Unfortunately, I am going to have to give a lawyer’s answer to this and say that “it depends”.

If the party responsible for administering the contract follows the procedure set out in most forms of contracts for instructing variations, then the answer is “no”, because the variation has been acknowledged and it will either be measured and evaluated as part of the remeasurement on a remeasureable contract or as a separate evaluation leading to a change of the contract price of a lump sum contract.Read more