Time at Large – An Explanation
A blog reader asked for an explanation of “time at large”. This is not something that I have personally come across in practical terms. For the advice that I am about to give, I am indebted to my ex-boss, Roger Knowles. Roger provides an explanation in his book, 150 Contractual Problems and their Solutions. Roger explains it arises:
“when a contract is entered into with no period of time fixed for completion. Where this occurs, the contractor’s obligation is to compete within a reasonable time.”
I have never experienced such a situation and I expect that when it does occur, it will be on smaller projects where the contract is between parties unfamiliar with good practice.
“There may also be circumstances which arise rendering a completion period fixed by the contract as no longer operable, again rendering time at large. An example is where a delay is caused by the employer and the terms of the contract make no provision for extending the completion date due to delays by the employer.”
How would this work in practice?
I have never worked on a project with such an argument. However, I have encountered projects where the employer modifies a standard contract to remove employer-risk items. An example would be a clause excluding an award of time for delay caused by late access to the site. With late site access, where access is not provided at the agreed time, the contractor cannot proceed. In this case, there would be no clause under which you could claim an extension of time. As a result, the contractual period would be inoperable.
Another very common reason which would cause the scenario to arise is where the contractor submits a valid extension of time claim. This is either not responded to, or an extension of time not awarded. The contractor, therefore, completes later than the contractual completion date. In practice, this is usually resolved retrospectively after completion. The parties may negotiate an award based on the extension of time that the contractor would reasonably be entitled to, or just “doing a deal” to close the matters.
If you find yourself dealing with construction claims regularly, the Construction Claims E-course is for you. You will learn to understand, prepare and respond to claims. Unresolved claims cost time and money, improve your chances of project success by enhancing your knowledge. Get started today.
6 Comments
Add comment Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
my initial response will be as follows
i feel that this situation comes very seldom on projects in my views and in a lumpsum contract like fidic silver book the contractor will not be entitled for any increase in rates as project completion in time is contractor risk and covered in his rates unless contract is provided a special condition otherwise. I,as the Engineer of the project in a case, considered this scenerio in one project where where there was a change in design by the employer was subsequently exta costs agreed by mutual consent for the extra time involved by agreement
liaqat hayat
I have a situation under FIDIC Red Book 1999 where a contractor wants the Engineer to consider revision of some rates as the contractor is operating at a loss. Mind you it os fixed rate contract. When does such a contract allow revision of rates.
Even though the Contractor has contractual right for time extension by the various reasons such as Client fault, Variation and etc, if the Client failed to finalize the time extension and therefore provide with no revised completion date, this situation we call as a Time at Large.
What happens when the contractor is delayed but fails to submit an application for extension of time and fails to submit a revised work program. What action can be taken by the Engineer in this situation.
What are the grounds to be considered when a termination of time at large period is finalised by the parties? I am bit surprised with the site possession example and this means time at large case can be considered in so many such circumstances.
What about the situation where the Engineer exceeds time specified for him to make a determination on Contractors
E.O.T. claim ?